<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Goo Theory</title>
	<link>http://www.gootheory.com</link>
	<description>Page Rank Secrets, SEO, Marketing, Business and Money Making Techniques</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-8228</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-8228</guid>
					<description>The competition for keywords is really caused a spike in CPC. I haven't looked at it for well over a year and man what a difference in cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The competition for keywords is really caused a spike in CPC. I haven&#8217;t looked at it for well over a year and man what a difference in cost.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by carl</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-8203</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-8203</guid>
					<description>I am seeing around 7% CTR for my ads and think that is fine.  I just don't see how greater than 10% is even possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am seeing around 7% CTR for my ads and think that is fine.  I just don&#8217;t see how greater than 10% is even possible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by Orlando Scooters</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-8180</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-8180</guid>
					<description>I was alleyways wondering if my CTR of about 15% was good enough. Now I know I can do much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was alleyways wondering if my CTR of about 15% was good enough. Now I know I can do much better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by Denver SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7793</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7793</guid>
					<description>I think that the industry makes a big difference in CTR.  Some verticals are so competitive, that you are just beating your head against the wall with AdWords trying to get some good performance.   In general, I think your rules of thumb are pretty good indicators of ad performance, regardless of vertical. 

Good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the industry makes a big difference in CTR.  Some verticals are so competitive, that you are just beating your head against the wall with AdWords trying to get some good performance.   In general, I think your rules of thumb are pretty good indicators of ad performance, regardless of vertical. </p>
<p>Good post!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by WebpageLottery</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7748</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7748</guid>
					<description>I thought i was doing really good for having 10% CTR. But after reading this articles and the comments, seems like there is more I need to improve. BTW, thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought i was doing really good for having 10% CTR. But after reading this articles and the comments, seems like there is more I need to improve. BTW, thanks for the post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by Home Business</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7706</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7706</guid>
					<description>Great article thanks!

As a newbie, I wanted to focus having a useful, informative and content rich site, yet my CTR has really sffered due to lack of ads and bad placement. I'm on about 0.75% overall which is awful (it was 33% for yesterday alone though).

I think I have some homework to do - which is ironic considering what my expertise is lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article thanks!</p>
<p>As a newbie, I wanted to focus having a useful, informative and content rich site, yet my CTR has really sffered due to lack of ads and bad placement. I&#8217;m on about 0.75% overall which is awful (it was 33% for yesterday alone though).</p>
<p>I think I have some homework to do - which is ironic considering what my expertise is lol!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ringtone Sites Drop in Popularity by Onas Ejaz</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/08/02/ringtone-sites-drop-in-popularity/#comment-7595</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/08/02/ringtone-sites-drop-in-popularity/#comment-7595</guid>
					<description>Hello my name is Onas I'm a webmaster of the site related to free mp3 ringtones download.  

I would like to buy a text link on your site's home page.http://www.gootheory.com

Please tell me how much does such link cost?

Looking for your reply.

Best Regards

Onas Ejaz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello my name is Onas I&#8217;m a webmaster of the site related to free mp3 ringtones download.  </p>
<p>I would like to buy a text link on your site&#8217;s home page.http://www.gootheory.com</p>
<p>Please tell me how much does such link cost?</p>
<p>Looking for your reply.</p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
<p>Onas Ejaz
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Bandwidth Thieves Increase Your PR? by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/02/07/can-bandwidth-thieves-increase-your-pr/#comment-7541</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/02/07/can-bandwidth-thieves-increase-your-pr/#comment-7541</guid>
					<description>Well, what happened? I see the date of the post as Feb 2006. Did you ever post your findings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what happened? I see the date of the post as Feb 2006. Did you ever post your findings?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Considered to be a Good CTR? by Racefietsen</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7519</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/30/what-is-considered-to-be-a-good-ctr/#comment-7519</guid>
					<description>These figures appear to be quite low. I have a site with a CTR of 25 - 30% for the past four years and I am a bit disappointed with a new site that &quot;only&quot; has a 4.5% CTR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These figures appear to be quite low. I have a site with a CTR of 25 - 30% for the past four years and I am a bit disappointed with a new site that &#8220;only&#8221; has a 4.5% CTR.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why HTML Sucks by Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/27/why-html-sucks/#comment-6814</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gootheory.com/2006/01/27/why-html-sucks/#comment-6814</guid>
					<description>I agree too but it will never happen. If you implement strict html parsing you will doom the html to a non evolving state because backward compatibility will be painful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree too but it will never happen. If you implement strict html parsing you will doom the html to a non evolving state because backward compatibility will be painful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
